SuperWeed

SuperWeed

communications from an eco-anarcha-feminist animal

SuperWeed RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Renaming the BP Oil “____” (A Contest)

Guest post by Greta Gaard

Ok, in the interests of Truth and Accuracy in Reporting, let’s think of a new word.

In daily news coverage since April 20, when BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig began gushing uncontrollably into the Gulf of Mexico, the media have persisted in calling this phenomenon a “spill.” Huh? When your child knocks over the juice glass at the breakfast table, that’s a “spill”—accidental, small in size, limited in impact, unskillful certainly, but blameless—and you can clean it up with a sponge. Is this thing in the Gulf comparable to a juice glass? Let’s see—

Accidental? Not really. Since the 1970s, past oil spills have proven deep-sea drilling is dangerous and uncontrollable. Attempts to remediate disasters have taken up to nine months, allowing oil to contaminate ocean life and coastal communities .

Size and impact? 8 ounces of sticky juice plus a few drips on the floor, vs. 1,470,000 gallons of toxic and suffocating black tar per day, impacting the lives and deaths of thousands of birds, fish, and human communities. Kitchen sponge clean-up doesn’t apply.

Blameless? Now we’re at the core: media usage of “spill” implies blamelessness and thereby protects the corporation…hmn…BP execs deny responsibility but generously work to “cap” (wait, aren’t caps usually twelve inches or less?)—I think we’re onto something. Media and corporations…where have we seen this connection before? And if we were going to de-link the two—not blaming anybody, heavens no, just naming actions with accuracy—what would we call it?

Spew? Blowout? Hemorrhage? How about “selfish-appropriation-of-earth’s-commons-for-corporate-profit”? Catchy. Maybe something in German, like “fuckendrillinsprechen” or “kapitalistichoilkeitdrownin”?

Let’s have a contest. Send in your suggestions for renaming BP’s presence in the Gulf. The winner gets prime media coverage and we can all write letters to the editor of our local papers, proposing the new word.

Go!

Superweed sez: Use the comments to propose a name or vote on those proposed by others. Winner will be declared by popular acclaim (or me) and will get a copy of my book, Aftershock.

Boycotting Marriage

Earlier this year — or was it last year? — I got into a lot of trouble for telling a reporter that I hope my heterosexual friends who are financially able to do so will boycott marriage until such time as it becomes available to everyone. I’m happy to report that a group of students has launched the National Marriage Boycott. Their slogan is “We won’t — until we all can.”

Me, I’m busy prepping classes for fall. SuperWeed will return to its regular broadcast schedule soon.

International Nature Writing


The August issue of Words Without Borders has got a lovely selection of innovative nature writing from eastern Europe, central Africa, South America, and some imaginary places. Check it out if you’re looking for something interesting to read on a sultry August afternoon wherever you happen to be. Think about place, time, circumstance, and how these intersect; how everyplace is sometime and, as Delmore Schwartz wrote, “all are circumstances.” I’ve just moved and am consequently even more aware than usual of place and time. More soon, once I get settled.

Against Vivisection (redux)

Still here at AR2009. As an adjunct to today’s “Commonalities of Oppression” talk, let me offer this link to last year’s talk on the same topic. Check out the intersections category for more posts on this topic; visit the connections page of the Eastern Shore Sanctuary website for even more ideas, essays, and links.

Nurturing Activism (redux)

I know, I know, I still need to post summaries of my talks at TLOV in June. But here I am in LA at AR2009, getting ready to appear on the “Nurturing Activism” panel, and so this seems a good time to share the link to my account of my 2007 talk on that topic. Here it is.

Mickey Z Interviews Me

As a way of helping the Eastern Shore Sanctuary get some publicity in the midst of our more expensive than anticipated relocation, Mickey Z wrote up an interview with me for OpEd News. It covers trauma and recovery, rooster rehabilitation, the social construction of gender by way of animals, and the origins of the sanctuary. Read it. Rate it. Share the link. Thanks, Mickey!

What We Can Learn from Sonia Sotomayor

The right-wing rhetorical flap over the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court puts me to mind of the failed nomination of Lani Guinier to the position of Assistant Attorney General back in 1993. As I wrote at the time,

One minute, [Lani Guinier] was a respected law professor and Justice Department nominee; the next minute, she was the “quota Queen.” Never mind that she had never advocated quotas; it was a catchy phrase, so the name stuck. In short order, Guinier was history. The truth was no defense against the orchestrated perception of her as a quota-slinging “reverse racist” hell-bent on destroying the very fabric of democracy.

Then, as now, liberals rushed to correct the record, clarifying and contextualizing Guinier’s positions on race-related questions. Then, as now, such efforts mattered not at all in the realm of right-wing rhetoric.

Don’t get me wrong, I think that Sonia Sotomayor will be confirmed to the Supreme Court. But that will be because, unlike Bill Clinton in 1993, Barack Obama has sufficient political capital and is willing to spend some of it on supporting his nominee. When Sotomayor ascends to the bench, it won’t be because Rachel Maddow won the argument with Bill O’Reilly. Nor, as we have already seen, will well-documented corrections of the record in any way dissuade opponents of Sotomayor from making misleading and even counter-factual claims about her.

I mention this because liberal defenders of Sotomayor — using facts, quotes and video clips to prove that Republican presidents have valued empathy too; that conservative Supreme Court nominees have said that their ethnicity and life history matters; and that, um, yes appeals court judges do “make law” routinely, whenever they issue precedent-setting rulings — remind me so strongly of advocates of veganism rushing to seize every opportunity to point out the ethical, environmental, and health benefits of plant-based diets.

All of that is necessary and important. But it’s not enough. When powerful political and economic forces are at play, rational suasion only goes so far. That’s why I and the Eastern Shore Sanctuary have always advocated a multifaceted, knowledge-based approach to the long-term project of converting a world-food system currently dominated by animal agriculture to the cruelty-free world of food for everybody we all want to see. Please visit the agriculture reform page of the newly renovated sanctuary website for details. And please do support the sanctuary generously if it is within your means to do so.

texts

Categories






Widget_logo



Random Post

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll